[연구논문][미국] Affirmative Action and Academic Freedom: Why the Supreme Court Should Continue Deferring to Faculty Judgments About the Value of Educational Diversity
제목: Affirmative Action and Academic Freedom: Why the Supreme Court Should Continue Deferring to Faculty Judgments About the Value of Educational Diversity
저자: Steve Sanders
출처: 1 Ind. J.L. & Soc. Equality 50 (2013) (Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality)
|
Introduction I. Academic Freedom and Judicial Deference From Sweezy to Grutter II. The Central Role of Faculty on Educational Policy Making Conclusion Affirmative action in higher education remains a controversial legal question, reflecting ongoing political and social debates about the role of race in American life. In Grutter, the Court held that a carefully limited program of affirmative action survived strict scrutiny because educational diversity was a compelling government interest. The value of educational diversity, in turn, was grounded in faculty members’ classroom experience, academic expertise, and professional judgment. As Grutter comes under new attack and possible reconsideration, my goal in this Article has been to explain that, should the Court now retreat from that view, it would be doing more than ignoring stare decisis or enshrining a more conservative view of the Constitution. It would be repudiating a long and important line of jurisprudence respecting the freedom of universities—acting upon the educational judgments of their faculties—to determine for themselves how best to carry out their academic missions. |
-
[연구논문][미국] Individual Academic Freedom: An Ordinary Concern of the First Amendment
-
[연구논문][미국] Academic Freedom and The First Amendment in the Supreme Court of the United States: An Unhurried Historical Review
-
[연구논문][미국] Affirmative Action and Academic Freedom: Why the Supreme Court Should Continue Deferring to Faculty Judgments About the Value of Educational Diversity
-
[연구논문][미국] Dangerous Thoughts? Academic Freedom, Free Speech, and Censorship Revisited in a Post-September 11th America
-
[연구논문][미국] Academic Freedom and The First Amendment in the Supreme Court of the United States: An Unhurried Historical Review
-
[연구논문][미국] Judicial Influence on Academic Decision-Making: A Study of Tenure Denial Litigation Cases in which Higher Education Institutions Did Not Wholly Prevail (May 2012)
-
[정책자료][미국] Faculty Tenure in Academe: The Evolution, Benefits and Implications of an Important Tradition
-
[연구논문][미국] Being Honest About Tenure in the United States: The Need for Tenure System Reform within Institutions of Higher Education
-
[연구논문][미국] Constitutional Tenure: Toward a Realization of Academic Freedom
-
[연구논문][미국] 제목: Judicial Enforcement of Academic Tenure: An Examination
-
[법률/규정][미국] Judicial Review of the Tenure Contract of a Professor in a Private College
-
[정책자료][미국] Funding Down, Tuition Up - State Cuts to Higher Education Threaten Quality and Affordability at Public Colleges
-
[정책자료][미국] Impact of the California State University System
-
[연구논문][미국] The Dismissal of Tenured Faculty for Reasons of Financial Exigency
-
[연구논문][미국] The Evolution of ABA Standards for Clinical Faculty
-
[법률규정][미국] Agreement Between Niagara County Community College And Adjuncts Association, NYSUT/AFT, AFL-CIO (Jan.1 2012 - Aug. 31 2015)
-
[연구논문][미국] Downsizing Higher Education and Derailing Student Educational Objectives: When Should Student Claims for Program Closures Succeed?
-
[정책자료][미국] Negotiating Academic Restructuring
-
[법률규정][미국] University System of Georgia - Section 8.0: Personnel
-
[연구논문][미국] Ethical Issues Faced by the Dual Professional: Lawyers as Faculty in Higher Education
